Alvaro Fernandez, the Chief Operations Officer (COO) at Lumoz, has said that whereas zero-knowledge rollups have demonstrated distinctive safety and scalability, the know-how continues to be not user-friendly. To deal with this challenge, networks ought to go for ZK Rollups-as-a-Service (ZK-RaaS) as a result of this simplifies the creation course of for a single ZK-Rollup. This makes them “extra accessible for builders and tasks to make use of,” Fernandez added.
Zero-Information Versus Optimistic Rollups
In his written solutions despatched to Bitcoin.com Information by way of Telegram, Fernandez argued that by providing what he known as “a seamless expertise” ZK-RaaS may quicken the “implementation of safe and scalable networks.” Whereas ZK-RaaS are believed to be safer, Optimistic Rollups-as-a-Service, then again, are favored for his or her simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Concerning business sectors most fitted to ZK-RaaS, the Lumoz COO recognized decentralized finance (defi), gaming platforms, and non-fungible token (NFT) marketplaces. In decentralized finance, ZK-RaaS mitigates challenges referring to conventional platforms’ “excessive charges and sluggish transaction speeds.” Through the use of ZK-RaaS, gaming platforms and NFT marketplaces can cut back transaction prices and enhance transaction velocity, whereas making certain the safety and privateness of their customers’ information.
Beneath are Alvaro Fernandez‘s solutions to all of the questions despatched to him.
Bitcoin.com Information (BCN): Zero-knowledge (ZK) rollups have confirmed to be particularly efficient in creating safe and scalable networks but the know-how is seemingly not user-friendly. Are you able to inform our readers what these zero-knowledge rollups or ZK-RaaS are all about and why they’re thought-about to be important for scalability?
Alvaro Fernandez (AF): Completely, whereas ZK-Rollups have demonstrated distinctive safety and scalability, their user-friendliness has been a problem. ZK-RaaS addresses this concern by offering a user-friendly platform that abstracts the complexities of ZK Rollup know-how.
ZK-RaaS simplifies the creation technique of a single ZK-Rollup, making it extra accessible for builders and tasks to make use of. As what Lumoz present, It’s a complete no-code course of, even peculiar folks can use the ZK-RaaS launch base to generate their very own ZK Rollup in minutes with bridges and explorers. One of many largest challenges for many of the ZK tasks is the prover price, often it’s the principle price of working a ZKRollup and its mission must spend a lot time and effort sustaining the machines. Lumoz proposed this decentralized prover community that takes care of all of the computing energy stuff, which is free to tasks.
This method is important for scalability as a result of it lowers the entry barrier, encouraging a broader adoption of ZK Rollup know-how. By providing a seamless expertise, ZK-RaaS accelerates the implementation of safe and scalable networks.
BCN: There are two varieties of Rollups-as-a-Service — Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups which might be broadly adopted by blockchain tasks. What’s the distinction between them and what are the professionals and cons of every?
AF: Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups are key Rollups-as-a-Service in blockchain. Optimistic Rollups assume transaction validity except disputed, providing flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, the arbitration course of could introduce delays. ZK-Rollups use Zero-Information Proofs for personal transaction verification, excelling in privateness and safety with sooner finality. But, they might have larger setup prices because of computational wants. The selection hinges on mission priorities: Optimistic Rollups for simplicity and cost-effectiveness, ZK-Rollups for heightened privateness and safety.
BCN: Your organization Lumoz makes use of a hybrid Proof-of-Work/Proof-of-Stake community to facilitate ZK-proof mining and allow builders to generate a custom-made zero-knowledge EVM chain. Might you inform us how this hybrid mannequin works and why it’s wanted within the first place?
AF: Whereas proof of stake is primarily related to the DA facet, numerous DA suppliers like Celestia, Avail, Radius, and Espresso populate the market. Initiatives are inspired to freely select any for seamless integration together with Lumoz DA.
Nevertheless, proof of labor stands out as a core power and a particular benefit of Lumoz. As talked about earlier, the era of zkps in all zk-rollups necessitates computing energy. Due to our decentralized prover community, miners can contribute their computing energy, take part in zkp era, and earn rewards via the POW course of. Leveraging Lumoz’s in depth expertise in mining, we’ve crafted this prover community to cut back limitations for tasks in search of to undertake zk know-how, whereas additionally facilitating miners to make invaluable contributions and obtain rewards.
BCN: With an increasing number of folks getting into the Web3 area, why do you suppose decentralized functions (dapps) deployed on legacy Layer-1 chains and Layer-2 options must think about using ZK-RaaS?
AF: Ethereum L1 is just too congested, which is why Vitalik proposed the necessity for L2 to cut back transaction charges and enhance TPS, bettering the general person expertise. The variations between ZK and OP have been talked about earlier, with ZK being safer. Lumoz’s zk-raas addresses the problems of ZK computation energy and deployment, enabling everybody to simply create custom-made zk-rollups.
Some great benefits of having one’s zk-rollup are evident — all on-chain assets serve the mission, avoiding rivalry. This leads to excessive TPS, low transaction charges, and a very good person expertise.
BCN: How does cross-rollup interoperability work with ZK-RaaS? Are you able to speak about Lumoz’s Native Cross Rollup Communication (NCRC) protocol that claims to supply a trustless answer for rollup interoperability?
AF: Cross-rollup interoperability is essential within the ZK-RaaS framework, and Lumoz’s NCRC protocol ensures a seamless and trustless answer. This enables direct communication between ZK-Rollup chains, fostering a decentralized and safe surroundings with out intermediaries. NCRC 2.0 enhances this by enabling cross-contract calls between second-layer networks, facilitating atomic cross-rollup contract calls.
Lumoz prioritizes person expertise by integrating the first-layer community seamlessly, making certain asset focus with out compromising decentralization. The NCRC protocol, particularly in its newest model, exemplifies Lumoz’s dedication to reaching trustless cross-rollup interoperability, addressing challenges, and enhancing the blockchain ecosystem’s connectivity.
BCN: What business segments are the almost certainly to profit from ZK-RaaS? And the way helpful might it’s for the Web2 firms that wish to construct their customized appchains?
AF: ZK-RaaS showcases its broad applicability throughout numerous business segments, extending its advantages past the blockchain realm. Within the monetary and decentralized finance sectors, ZK-RaaS has the potential to rework transactions by making certain safety and scalability, mitigating challenges associated to excessive charges and sluggish transaction speeds on conventional platforms.
Gaming platforms and NFT marketplaces can leverage ZK-RaaS for scalable and cost-effective transactions involving in-game belongings and distinctive digital belongings represented as NFTs. Moreover, in id administration, ZK-RaaS can play a vital function in authenticating customers with out exposing delicate data, making it invaluable for industries requiring sturdy id options.
As Web2 firms enterprise into constructing customized Appchains, ZK-RaaS emerges as a multifaceted answer, providing scalability, privateness preservation, customization, cost-effectiveness, and interoperability. This complete set of options positions ZK-RaaS as a flexible alternative for enhancing capabilities and assembly numerous wants within the evolving digital panorama.
What are your ideas on this interview? Tell us what you suppose within the feedback part under.
